Indian Thought Latest News & Views
New Delhi. Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari made a big statement regarding the G-20 meeting to be held in Srinagar. He said that organizing any event of the world in Srinagar shows India’s arrogance. Will answer on time in such a way that they will remember. Now India’s Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar has given his reaction on Zardari’s statement. ‘He has nothing to do with G20. I would also say that he has nothing to do with Srinagar. The only issue is when will Pakistan (pakistan)remove its occupation from POK.
S Jaishankar said without naming Pakistan, “They have nothing to do with G20”. He has nothing to do with Srinagar either. There is only one issue of discussion that when will Pakistan vacate the illegally occupied POK. He said that Article 370 is now history, the sooner people understand the better.
No discussion with country promoting terrorism: Jaishankar
On a bilateral meeting with the Chinese Foreign Minister, Jaishankar said that the issue of disengagement in the western sector was discussed. There is also discussion on BRICS and G20. The Foreign Minister said that Zardari was treated fairly as a member of the SCO countries, but he has been given a befitting reply as a supporter and spokesperson of the terrorist industry. Targeting Pakistan, he said that we cannot discuss terrorism by sitting with countries that promote terrorism.
befitting reply to pakistan
Jaishankar said that it was made clear not once or twice in the SCO meeting regarding the so-called corridor between Pakistan and China that connectivity is necessary for development, but connectivity cannot violate anyone’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. He said that Jammu and Kashmir was, is and will remain an integral part of India. Like all the states and union territories of the country, the G-20 meeting is also being held in Jammu and Kashmir. There is nothing unusual in this. He said that Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, as the foreign minister of an SCO member country, was treated like the foreign minister of other member countries. But their (Pakistan’s) position as promoter, protector and spokesperson of terrorism industry was countered.
