Bareilly: The discussion of the Hijab controversy in Karnataka is in full swing. Meanwhile, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, said on the hijab controversy that the country would run by the Constitution, not Sharia.
What did CM Yogi say on the Hijab controversy?
Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath said that the system of the country will be run by the constitution and not by Shariat. Every organization has the right to formulate its own dress code. The system will run according to the constitution.
Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath said that the face of the opposition has withered after the first phase. On his statement that calmed the heat, CM Yogi said that those who were responsible for the riots, for the migration of Kairana, came out of the bills after the announcement of the elections. This was for them. The government will work with the policy of zero tolerance for crime and criminals.
Let us tell you that the Hijab controversy started from Udupi in Karnataka. Here the students protested against the entry of girl students wearing hijab in the class. In protest against the hijab, some students came to the college wearing saffron gamchas. Then the same thing happened in many schools and colleges of Udupi. At the same time, Muslim girl students are telling hijab as part of their religion and saying that the constitution allows to follow their religion.
On the hijab controversy, the Karnataka High Court said on Friday that we request the state government and all stakeholders to open educational institutions and allow students to return to class soon. Along with this, we prohibit all students from bringing saffron shawls, gamchha, hijab, religious flag or similar items to class till further orders. The High Court Court clarified that this order is limited to only those institutions, where the college development committees have prescribed the student dress code / uniform.
The Karnataka High Court expressed grief over the fact that schools and colleges in the state have been closed for the past several days due to unnecessary agitation on the hijab. When the court is considering the matter and the question of constitutional importance is being heard, then there is no point in continuing these demonstrations.