Indian Thought Latest News & Views
Washington: The Supreme Court has stayed the order to install name plates on shops in the Kanwar Yatra route in many states including Uttar Pradesh. However, India’s neighboring country Pakistan has now reached America regarding this matter. Actually, a Pakistani journalist asked US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller a question related to the order to install name plates in some states of India. However, Matthew Miller reminded the Pakistani journalist that the Supreme Court (Supreme Court) has already put a stay on the relevant order.
Supreme Court has already put a stay – America
A Pakistani journalist had raised a question in America on the issue of nameplate in Kanwar Yatra. In response to this, US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said that we have seen those reports. We have also seen reports that the Indian Supreme Court had issued an interim stay on the implementation of those rules on July 22. So those rules are not really effective.
We are committed to promoting and protecting the respect of freedom of religion and belief for everyone in the world…
US State Department spokesman Matthew Miller further said that generally speaking, we are committed to promoting and protecting the respect of freedom of religion and belief for everyone in the world. We are also in touch with counterparts for this.
Petition in support of name plate in Supreme Court
On the other hand, a new petition has been filed in the Supreme Court in support of the Muzaffarnagar Police’s instruction to write the names of shopkeepers selling food items outside the shop. Petitioner Surjeet Singh Yadav says that the instruction to install name plates has been given in view of the convenience of Shiv devotees, their faith and to maintain law and order, but in the petitions filed in the court, an attempt has been made to unnecessarily give it a communal color. Those who have filed a petition on this issue in the court are not shopkeepers, but those who want to give it a political color. Citing the fundamental rights of Shiva devotees, the petitioner has demanded that he be made a party in the matter and that his side be heard.
